Most SARs and STRs don’t fail because compliance teams don’t care. They fail because nobody showed them the standard.
Regulators in 2026 are not just counting reports — they are reading them. Quality expectations have tightened across the EU, UK, and beyond: vague narratives, missing red flags, and unsupported suspicion assessments are now a direct route to findings, fines, and remediation orders.
Join Andrei Sribny and Viktor Tkatsenko on 30 June at 15:00 CEST for a practical session on what separates a SAR or STR that passes inspection from one that creates regulatory exposure — and how to close that gap in your team’s reporting practice.
Everyone who registers receives the STR Logbook — a ready-to-use working tool — immediately on sign-up.
- What regulators actually look for when they review SARs and STRs in 2026
- The most common failure points — narratives, suspicion grounds, and timing
- How to structure a report that documents the decision, not just the transaction
- STR Logbook walkthrough — how to use it in daily compliance work
- Live Q&A — bring your real reporting questions